Tazer or Flamethrower? Vote Please.

[Farley4Fan]

i don't really understand why everyone is so against this.  It's just a possible visual replacement for the tazer (for merc).

[AgentX_003]

i don't really understand why everyone is so against this.  It's just a possible visual replacement for the tazer (for merc).

Wow... wtf is that man... it couldn't be further away from the spirit of splinter cell or make less sense... I mean how do you justify ''a flamethrower having the same effect as a tazer''

[Roberto1223]

i dont think its good for spies but i think its good for mercs!

[frvge]

Of course... we always meant the Merc's Tazer. lol.

[VaNilla]

How/why are mercs supposed to be discreet?

And you can burn the spy to death!  Just like you can taze a spy to death.  It takes more than one shot though.  The real issue here is performance.  If the dev team could find a way to work around that then what would be the issue?  I think it would be cool.  Mercs burn, spies shock.  Fits the style.

Fire with one shot could easily kill a person, Tazer with one shot could not. A person on fire could turn it against another, a tazed person could not. Mercs are meant to be discreet if they have any sense, if I was merc and went around running shouting at the top of my voice spouting flames and jumping up and down, it's very easy for the spies to take me on. If I'm discreet and hide around places, and keep quiet, I have more chance of catching the spies and they have to be more alert. Mercs burning people really does not fit, it's not that we don't understand you, it's that you don't understand us.

[Kurbutti]

i don't really understand why everyone is so against this.  It's just a possible visual replacement for the tazer (for merc).

It's simply because there is no need. Besides, I was joking when I brought up the FT.

[LennardF1989]

Just for the sake of this discussion, but coding it won't be a problem....

[Cyntrox]

Fire with one shot could easily kill a person, Tazer with one shot could not.

Actually, it could.

Not that it matters, I still voted no. Because if this and flares were put in, the Axtinguisher would be obligatory.

[Farley4Fan]

What's the axtinguisher? 

And how about the spy could roll on the ground a bit to get the fire to go out.  A little more animation but hey, I think it would be much cooler than the CT tazer.

[Blank Man]

I think it would be much cooler than the CT tazer.

idc

[Farley4Fan]

Blankman with the dickhole comment as usual.  Why didn't we ban this loser?

[LennardF1989]

Blankman with the dickhole comment as usual.  Why didn't we ban this loser?

You have a serious problem with Blankman, don't you?

Stop being a 'dickhole' yourself and stay ontopic and stop trying to put up a whole community against someone.

Don't reply to this, just go on with the discussion.

[VaNilla]

Fire with one shot could easily kill a person, Tazer with one shot could not.

Actually, it could.

I think easily was the keyword there :P.

[Spark Mandriller]

You can have your flamethrower after I get my maid robots vs catgirl witches.


In fact actually no you can't your idea sucks too much sorry try harder next time.

[Blank Man]

I'm a little dick hole short and stout. Here is my handle here is my spout. Tip me over and pour me out.