SM2 support being removed next UDK build

Started by LennardF1989, May 29, 2010, 02:54:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

unskilled

Quote from: LennardF1989 on June 10, 2010, 07:15:02 PM
Ever saw movies at 120FPS? It's simply a case of being spoiled with high framerates you can't stand any lower, whereas 24-30FPS is perfectly acceptable for most users who don't have a octocore PC with the latest Nvidia graphics card. Anything lower than that will appear sluggish.

Movies don't have graphic engine. Games works different on another Frames Per Second rate ;) For example CoD4  125+FPS = longer and higher jump.

Succubus Dryad Of The Undying Comet

Quote from: unskilled on June 10, 2010, 08:03:39 PM
Quote from: LennardF1989 on June 10, 2010, 07:15:02 PM
Ever saw movies at 120FPS? It's simply a case of being spoiled with high framerates you can't stand any lower, whereas 24-30FPS is perfectly acceptable for most users who don't have a octocore PC with the latest Nvidia graphics card. Anything lower than that will appear sluggish.

Movies don't have graphic engine. Games works different on another Frames Per Second rate ;) For example CoD4  125+FPS = longer and higher jump.
That's because the engine is fucked up.

LennardF1989

#32
That's called bad programming. My point is: Ever had the feeling movies were sluggish/lagging? NO! 24FPS is a perfectly normal framerate. It has nothing to do whether or not it's a graphics engine, or do you honestly believe Shrek 2 (which is a movie rendered by a graphics engine, duh) HAS to be played at 120FPS for best experience?

frvge

If it has double-vision for 3D effect, yes :P Agreed about bad programming. FPS shouldnt affect anything gameplay-wise as long as it is 24fps or better.
Quote from: savior2006SCDA has more bugs than a rain forest.
Quote
Treat your customers with respect you make more customers. Treat your customers like pirates, you make more pirates.

Gawain

there's hell of a difference between 24fps and 60fps, especially in interactive use.

MulleDK19

It's annoying watching movies... They're so fucking laggy.

Anything below 60 is just extremely laggy and annoying to me.



Argh, stupid TVs running 25-30 fps, fucking sucks, I can almost count all the frames... So fucking slow! >:(

If my heart ever heals, I will make sure it'll never break again.

LennardF1989

Yea! Time to put a new graphics card in my TV!

tigaer

Quote from: LennardF1989 on June 11, 2010, 07:30:25 AM
Yea! Time to put a new graphics card in my TV!

i lol'd.

Anyway, we got some badass programmers, so I'd think they'd do their best to figure out any way to get the minimum requirements as low as they can. Right guys?

LennardF1989

Quote from: tigaer on June 11, 2010, 07:42:50 AM
Quote from: LennardF1989 on June 11, 2010, 07:30:25 AM
Yea! Time to put a new graphics card in my TV!

i lol'd.

Anyway, we got some badass programmers, so I'd think they'd do their best to figure out any way to get the minimum requirements as low as they can. Right guys?
As said, I want to be able to play at a absolute minimum of 24FPS with the best experience (light/shadow wise), without having to upgrade either my laptop or my PC.

Gawain

i still can't decide where to go with my system.
atm all i got is a 17" macbook pro 2009 model and some hifi stuff.
it does 95% of what i need beautifully, but sometimes i'll want to play some windows-only games with some raw hardware gfx power on a fucking large screen, use maya with furryball etc.

any suggestions?

LennardF1989


Spekkio

Quotebut sometimes i'll want to play some windows-only games with some raw hardware gfx power on a fucking large screen, use maya with furryball etc.

any suggestions?
Get a windows PC.

LennardF1989

Quote from: LennardF1989 on June 12, 2010, 02:28:02 PM
Dude, it's a Mac!
I would kill for one right now, need to debug a payed website I made which seems to be borked big-time on a Mac/Safari combination.

Farley4Fan

You don't need to do anything with a mac.  They magically upgrade.  With magic.

Gawain