2 vs 2? why not 3 vs 3?

Started by ch1leang0d, January 24, 2011, 07:25:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ch1leang0d

i been watching this game for a while on indie games and just now decided to register on the website and i noticed in the game faqs that PS is only 2 Vs 2 which i think will prove aggravating. new players and players that just can't get the hang of the game will constantly cause a problem for teammates and this isn't the kind of game where u can still win a lop sided battle. i say making it 3 vs 3 with an option to start a game with 2 vs 2.

other questions...
is there a ranking system? i hate not knowing how good/bad a teammate is lol
can i use a joystick with this game? xbox 360 controller?
is it donnnee yett??????????? lol

DreadStunLock

Though you will 99.9% get your ass handed if you use an Xbox 360 controller, due to the sensitivity, but as spy I can see that working well.


NeoSuperior

Quote from: ch1leang0d on January 24, 2011, 07:25:44 PM[...]i say making it 3 vs 3 with an option to start a game with 2 vs 2.[...]

LOL will definitly not happen. This game is and always will be 2vs2 by default. And MAYBE you can make an alternative option of 3vs3.. but 3vs3 will never be the "default" mode
If there are any orthographic/grammatical errors in this post, you can keep them and, if you want, hang them over your bed ;)

"As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
- Mike Godwin

CurdyMilk

I say we should make it 7v7.  Why not?   :D

frvge

It's all possible with our framework.
Quote from: savior2006SCDA has more bugs than a rain forest.
Quote
Treat your customers with respect you make more customers. Treat your customers like pirates, you make more pirates.

puuusianka

Quote from: ch1leang0d on January 24, 2011, 07:25:44 PM
i been watching this game for a while on indie games and just now decided to register on the website and i noticed in the game faqs that PS is only 2 Vs 2 which i think will prove aggravating. new players and players that just can't get the hang of the game will constantly cause a problem for teammates and this isn't the kind of game where u can still win a lop sided battle. i say making it 3 vs 3 with an option to start a game with 2 vs 2.

other questions...
is there a ranking system? i hate not knowing how good/bad a teammate is lol
can i use a joystick with this game? xbox 360 controller?
is it donnnee yett??????????? lol

let me ask you this one thing did you ever play scct versus? I seriously suggest you try it and after let's say 3 months of playing ask yourself again why it's 2vs2.
It is possible to create maps for 3vs3 tho it's hard to keep the balance then. 4vs4 would be more like there are two pieces of map and the 2 teams of spy and 2 teams of mercs. They can't get to each other but they can hack things which will affect each others places. Any different way is not going to work.

knooger

God, I please you, I FUCKING PLEASE 2v2 only >.<

Believe me, you will find so quick same freak as you are and start playing with him together.

Wh1tE_Dw4rF

I want 40v40 maps. Then we can all fight in the middle and forget the towers. Oh wait, wrong game.

puuusianka

No no knooger I think we should discover new ways of playing such games. I thought how to make maps which are like missions in coop but without bots. In that case we have many possibilities the idea of rotating slots would be nice in it. There would be moments where we have 2vs2, sometimes there would be 3 mercs vs 2 spys. Sometimes one merc vs 2 spies. This would be like going from one map to another. Very short locations where is 1 obj to take only. Also then the mercs abillities would change. They would differ from each other during the switching. One with gun one with knife? The other has only torch and can punch you and stop for a moment but can't really kill you. I think that this kind of think could work it just needs testing.   

DreadStunLock

3v3 is not big deal, anything more than that and Story will die because Spies will always go 4/5/6v1 on a mercenary and kill him to the end of his lives.

Farley4Fan

69v69

We're talking about the Kinect sex game right?

Rysiu-.

lets make it 32v32 with possibility of TAG 63 spies v 1 merc!!!
I know more CT bugs than you could ever imagine. I just had forgot about half of them.

knooger

Quote from: puuusianka on January 24, 2011, 09:50:28 PM
No no knooger I think we should discover new ways of playing such games. I thought how to make maps which are like missions in coop but without bots. In that case we have many possibilities the idea of rotating slots would be nice in it. There would be moments where we have 2vs2, sometimes there would be 3 mercs vs 2 spys. Sometimes one merc vs 2 spies. This would be like going from one map to another. Very short locations where is 1 obj to take only. Also then the mercs abillities would change. They would differ from each other during the switching. One with gun one with knife? The other has only torch and can punch you and stop for a moment but can't really kill you. I think that this kind of think could work it just needs testing.   

GTFO of here :D

puuusianka

God damn it I shouldn't have watched that synecdoche film it makes me think about unreal things. Can someone edit my earlier post?! Pls...

Rysiu-.

I know more CT bugs than you could ever imagine. I just had forgot about half of them.