Alpha Pavonis

[Cronky]

I think Cronky just stated that COD didn't improve on the graphics that much for it to be really impressive, as well as who in this thread buys games just for it's graphics?

Duke Nukem graphics suck to me because they aren't living up to the standards of 2011 as a Sci-fi FPS, and it's true, look at BFBC2, it's not futuristic but the graphics in there are awesome.

I have to assume you.

[DreadStunLock]

To me, I wouldn't really enjoy playing BFBC2 with lowest graphics due to the fact that graphics enhance environments, destruction detail, quakes and smoke.

If they were all on lowest detail or switched off completely, it wouldn't feel like a heavy warfare, thus for me it would completely ruin the gameplay.

Besides, unless Human Revolution and Blizzard Entertainment games proves me wrong, 2011 did not have any games that had a good storyline, at least for me.

[knooger]

Really? Just buy bf2 and play some Project Reality it haven't got uber quakes, destruction etc. but gives you real warfare.  ;)

[Spark Mandriller]

...

[DreadStunLock]

Really? Just buy bf2 and play some Project Reality it haven't got uber quakes, destruction etc. but gives you real warfare.  ;)

Yeah.....uber quakes and destructions are what warfare games need to make it as much realistic as possible, not interested.

[Cronky]

...

So I assume this picture means you found what you were looking for, right???

[Spark Mandriller]

I don't even know.

[LoChang]

IM SO FONCUSED

[Finrar]

Really? Just buy bf2 and play some Project Reality it haven't got uber quakes, destruction etc. but gives you real warfare.  ;)

This.