Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ChickenSkin

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
Public Discussion / Re: cool idea
« on: November 01, 2008, 09:02:32 PM »
Nope, most other maps are planned to not have the CT-feel. The problem is, they dont even have layouts yet, so it's also for us still uncertain how they might differ. Basically, Lakehouse is supposed to be one-of-a-kind, as a guide for old-skool players.

He means the "CT feel" gameplay wise rather than graphically. I assumed all the maps would play similarly to CT, seeing as thats what its being compared with, and I really hope they do.

2
Public Discussion / Re: A different take on flares
« on: November 01, 2008, 03:13:46 PM »
Eh, I'd rather have the gasmask as an innate piece of equipment. Flares really don't serve much of a purpose when the mercs have a lot of other tools available to them to see in dark spots.

Why not just make frags & GM innate gadgets for story mode? I don't see the point in making them 'selectable' gadgets because EVERYBODY takes them for story mode. This would leave the other 4 gadget slots open, which
means not all player will take the same old 'BP, Mines, Nades, Mask' or 'Traps, Mines, Nades, Mask' combo. Obviously some may say its too OP, mercs having so many gadgets, and may require some gadgets to be rethought or even new ones created, but it will certainly make the game more interesting.

3
Public Discussion / Re: A different take on flares
« on: November 01, 2008, 12:17:55 PM »
I see no reason why they shouldn't be compulsory. The lakehouse map did look VERY dark, and I think mercs will have a hard enough time just patrolling as it is, so flares could come in useful here. I actually didn't mind the burn time, and brightness of the flare in CT, just that there were too many of them. Set it to three flares per life and it will force mercs to be more conservatory with them, and use them wisely. Could prove for some interesting gameplay.

4
Public Discussion / Re: Idea (probably gonna get flamed)
« on: October 30, 2008, 06:06:00 PM »
I think it\'d be rather annoying to play like that. Idea is cool. but I don\'t see it working.

Agreed. Slow-Mo and SAM just dont go together.

5
Presentation Forum / Re: PS Website: What should be in it?
« on: October 30, 2008, 04:32:17 PM »
yeah, no need for geek shirts.
i can\'t see a problem with paying for a dedicated server, afterall you pay for the server and not for the mod oO

From my understanding a dedicated server would be listed as one of the mods services, which means we arent allowed to pay for it, only donate.

6
Presentation Forum / Re: PS Website: What should be in it?
« on: October 30, 2008, 04:21:29 PM »
Im sure all of the community would happily pay some sort of yearly / one off fee for the dedicated servers, website servers, and ongoing support of project stealth (patches and stuff) if you guys need the money.
We are not allowed to ask money for the game or its services (website, dedicated server) as long as the game is a mod for UT3. If we win a license, we can.

For now, we can only accept donations. Or sell T-shirts :P

I will be donating once the beta is released, not sure how often or whatever as I need some money for myself, but so long as you guys keep the patches / new levels coming I will be donating. Im not buying a T-shirt though, might aswell write geek on my forehead with a permanent marker :P.

7
Presentation Forum / Re: PS Website: What should be in it?
« on: October 30, 2008, 11:41:13 AM »
Im sure all of the community would happily pay some sort of yearly / one off fee for the dedicated servers, website servers, and ongoing support of project stealth (patches and stuff) if you guys need the money.

8
Presentation Forum / Re: PS Website: What should be in it?
« on: October 30, 2008, 12:03:54 AM »
Going to sound pretttttty gay, but a little paragraph or two on each of the devs would be nice. Maybe when you have a beta, a little story (in want for a better word) of how the mod started, how long it took, when it started, any difficulties you ran into, internal troubles (dev team, technical difficulties), external troubles (like Ubi threats, community etc), highlights of the project. You know like a story or report on everything. That would humour me and Im sure it would interest a lot of the other community (If not ban them, for they are ungrateful) ;].

I think everything else was mentioned in my previous post :].

9
Public Discussion / Re: Idea (probably gonna get flamed)
« on: October 29, 2008, 11:47:06 PM »
I cant see this working tbh, not in a game like this.

10
Public Discussion / Re: CRD Vision
« on: October 29, 2008, 11:45:55 PM »
Thing is, peoples thought process is all wrong.

The thought process of the average noob:

Cool new gadget Idea > Desperately trying to find ways they could implement there awesome gadget.

Instead of:

What things needs to be improved for PS > Cool new gadget Idea.

People also need to stop defending there own gadget ideas to death. It will save everybody a lot of time and seperate the wheat from the chaff.

11
Public Discussion / Re: just something out of curiosity
« on: October 29, 2008, 11:24:44 PM »
Banhammah pl0x.

Motion Seconded, Blank is an ass.

12
Presentation Forum / Re: PS Website: What should be in it?
« on: October 28, 2008, 12:35:13 AM »
Ok in bullet points:

> PS account should be linked with your website account, so users can check win:loss ratio or whatever.
> Friend list should also be linked, and users can send messages to people in game via the website.
> Match, Clan, and Clan recruitment schedular should be placed on the website.
> People can make clan pages, via the website, similar to xfires clan page thing, but better.
> Users can upload gameplay videos and have the vidoes linked to their profile or clan.
> Forum, Similar to this.
> You can join games directly from the website.
> Each player should have a profile page, which can be fully customizable (ie font, background, info, all that crap)
> A who is online notification somewhere, so you know who is playing (like the thing PS has on the homepage).
> It should have some more advanced tutorials on it so if players so desire they can do them (unfortunately we have to consider the mid skill level....)
> Maybe some sort of rating system, to rate if people are friendly or flame or whatever, idk.

(Not saying any of these ideas are possible, just would be nice, I havent thought out any of the ideas, just off of the top of my head so some ideas may suck).

13
Public Discussion / Re: A new Merc Vision... A new spy weapon?
« on: October 23, 2008, 01:05:38 PM »
Ive been talking with someone (please excuse my lack of remembering names) on XFire, and he had a great idea for a vision which would extend the sound detecting for mercs, completely with counters and downsides (and thats exactly what I meant with the 4 steps above). This vision also came with a counter gadget for the spies by the way, which on it\'s turn had a downside as well.

Sounds interesting, any chance you/he could expand on the idea?

14
You just posted a video with voice annotation, I posted a video from a film. Now I said that the character Brent was you, and if i dont know what you look like, what other reasoning would i have to saying that he is you? Your voice mayhap?

Seriously dude, lighten up, i was fucking around.

I didn\\\'t understand what comparisons you were trying to make. Personally I don\\\'t think I sound anything like him and that\\\'s why I didn\\\'t get the joke.

And why tell me to lighten up? I don\\\'t give a shit about any of it.

However, you did get one thing right, I do love me some sheep fucking.

Lol ok np, didn\\\'t mean to offend you or anything.

Quote
Oh oh oh oh...and this one time at Band Camp...
American Pie ftw!

I dare someone to finish that sentence (you all know which one I mean ^^) :P

Haha, I dont want this forum to be filled with words for The pubic region of females, thank you very much :]. Although it is a perfectly natural, normal thing.

15
You just posted a video with voice annotation, I posted a video from a film. Now I said that the character Brent was you, and if i dont know what you look like, what other reasoning would i have to saying that he is you? Your voice mayhap?

Seriously dude, lighten up, i was fucking around.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4