Project Stealth

Forums => General / Off-Topic => Topic started by: Roberto1223 on November 14, 2009, 12:42:46 AM

Title: Carrie Prejean Sex tape
Post by: Roberto1223 on November 14, 2009, 12:42:46 AM
LOL fucking prick ass selfish faggot got her into a lot of trouble after she expressed her opinion against faggot marriage.
she got fired somehow thanks to the fag man, and then she sewed the beauty pagent for that. then the lawsuit was settled with a sex tape the gay guy somehow found.

lol i gotta see this tape.
im against the gay guy for being such an asshole, but thanks to him we will see a tape of her getting fucked not to long from now
Title: Re: Carrie Prejean Sex tape
Post by: MR.Mic on November 14, 2009, 05:13:15 AM
Nobody cares
Title: Re: Carrie Prejean Sex tape
Post by: frvge on November 14, 2009, 06:43:45 PM
My internal spambot detection went haywire because of all those words that are usually in spam messages.

I'm not sure if this falls under rule 1 because of the lot of derogatary terms for homosexuals. You might want to rephrase a few 'faggot' with 'gay'. Or edit your post completely.

Personally, I don't see any use/meaning of this thread besides you telling us that you are looking forward to seeing her video. But I guess that's fine. Meh. /care.
Title: Re: Carrie Prejean Sex tape
Post by: Roberto1223 on November 14, 2009, 07:39:04 PM
i wouldnt mind watching the video xD but i dont think its gonna leak out cause they settled the lawsuit because of that.

it probably dossent even have good angles anyway and is recorded in shitty night vision lol.

geez louise the forum is dead and everybody has this attitude as if they had a hair up the ass lol.
lighten up!

*Conviction is coming out soon (FACT)
LOL

Title: Re: Carrie Prejean Sex tape
Post by: Westfall on November 14, 2009, 11:44:13 PM
You sound gayer than the gay guy you're talking about.
Title: Re: Carrie Prejean Sex tape
Post by: Farley4Fan on November 18, 2009, 07:24:44 AM
Quote from: frvge on November 14, 2009, 06:43:45 PM
My internal spambot detection went haywire because of all those words that are usually in spam messages.

I'm not sure if this falls under rule 1 because of the lot of derogatary terms for homosexuals. You might want to rephrase a few 'faggot' with 'gay'. Or edit your post completely.

Personally, I don't see any use/meaning of this thread besides you telling us that you are looking forward to seeing her video. But I guess that's fine. Meh. /care.

Your avatar combined with this post amuses me.  Thankyou. 

lol
Title: Re: Carrie Prejean Sex tape
Post by: LennardF1989 on November 18, 2009, 12:59:13 PM
Quote from: Roberto1223 on November 14, 2009, 07:39:04 PM
geez louise the forum is dead and everybody has this attitude as if they had a hair up the ass lol.
lighten up!
It's not our task to keep a forum active, that's where its members are for. We just release stuff now and then.
Title: Re: Carrie Prejean Sex tape
Post by: neth on November 18, 2009, 07:26:00 PM
It would be cool if there were people to play the game you create. I guess that's the reason why you should keep the forum active.
Title: Re: Carrie Prejean Sex tape
Post by: Wh1tE_Dw4rF on November 18, 2009, 10:19:18 PM
Quote from: neth on November 18, 2009, 07:26:00 PM
It would be cool if there were people to play the game you create. I guess that's the reason why you should keep the forum active.


I know who will play the game but I'm afraid neither of us are on the list now.
Title: Re: Carrie Prejean Sex tape
Post by: LennardF1989 on November 19, 2009, 12:43:11 PM
Quote from: neth on November 18, 2009, 07:26:00 PM
It would be cool if there were people to play the game you create. I guess that's the reason why you should keep the forum active.

Agreed, but it's not our task to create x topics every week. I guess it would be pretty cool if there will be one official topic for each gadget/weapon/whatever, so it can be discussed, the creator should then keep the first post up-2-date (even with stuff he himself doesn't like), so we have a clear overview of everything.

And then I mean you have to review everything again, don't just post: "Already discussed, ZOMG: <link>".

I think I'll start the first per example and then other devs can follow.