Project Stealth

The first 3 splinter cells were awesome, they took skill, required patience and were very original games...the spy vs mercs was so legendary and skillfull, ubisoft completely dumbed down the svm in double agent and ruined a great thing, then they just completely ruined everything about splinter cell , and released a 10 yr olds dream, aka conviction...when i watch conviction gameplay video's and trailers i seriously just want to puke, its a joke and its not even splinter cell anymore, casual gaming has ruined the console genre, and I'm definitely going to buy a pc for the independent hardcore titles out there, such as project stealth, thank god theres people out there that know how to make games , and make them right, project stealth is everything i wanted after chaos theory, and u guys are making it, great job so far and I hope to hear more about it soon.

You've never played Conviction, have you?

I can assure you, as long as you don't play on Rookie, it's still Splinter Cell.

Rookie plays the same as Realistic.

Not really... ;)

i just watched some multiplayer footage. looks to me as if this was the fastest, most short-term-fun splinter cell mp ever. i really wonder if they can still boost the casual players appeal in the successor after this... xD

And we'd done so well ignoring this thread up to now...

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 26, 2010, 06:06:49 PM
Not really... ;)

Yes really... ;)

On realistic, your aiming reticle snaps to the enemy's head if you are aiming at their body when you push the zoom button.  That should be for rookies, but it's on realistic.

Quote from: Ambiguous Rocket on April 26, 2010, 08:11:32 PM
And we'd done so well ignoring this thread up to now...

you sure help with that :D

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 26, 2010, 09:23:53 PM

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 26, 2010, 06:06:49 PM
Not really... ;)

Yes really... ;)

On realistic, your aiming reticle snaps to the enemy's head if you are aiming at their body when you push the zoom button.  That should be for rookies, but it's on realistic.

Isn't that just console auto-aim? Because they have a hard time to hit stuff?

Quote from: Wh1tE_Dw4rF on April 27, 2010, 04:09:18 PM

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 26, 2010, 09:23:53 PM

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 26, 2010, 06:06:49 PM
Not really... ;)

Yes really... ;)

On realistic, your aiming reticle snaps to the enemy's head if you are aiming at their body when you push the zoom button.  That should be for rookies, but it's on realistic.

Isn't that just console auto-aim? Because they have a hard time to hit stuff?

Indeed, I doubt it's in the PC version.

Quote from: Wh1tE_Dw4rF on April 27, 2010, 04:09:18 PM

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 26, 2010, 09:23:53 PM

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 26, 2010, 06:06:49 PM
Not really... ;)

Yes really... ;)

On realistic, your aiming reticle snaps to the enemy's head if you are aiming at their body when you push the zoom button.  That should be for rookies, but it's on realistic.

Isn't that just console auto-aim? Because they have a hard time to hit stuff?

It might be.  But that's beside the point.  I can turn off auto-aim on most games but NOT this game, it doesn't even turn off for you on REALISTIC!  How hard is it to aim?  For fuck's sake this game was made for babies.

Also, even on console, I have NEVER encountered a game where if you aim at the enemy's nuts it snaps to their head for an easy headshot.  Ever.  I have never seen something like that.  The most common auto aim is just something that eases your cursor towards the enemy, and you can usually turn that off or it is not present on the hardest difficulty.

A wise man once said "Sam Fisherprice"...

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 26, 2010, 09:23:53 PM

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 26, 2010, 06:06:49 PM
Not really... ;)

Yes really... ;)

On realistic, your aiming reticle snaps to the enemy's head if you are aiming at their body when you push the zoom button.  That should be for rookies, but it's on realistic.

That doesn't make rookie mode 'play the same as realistic'.

You're Sam Fisher, you are not suppose to miss your shots.

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 27, 2010, 06:38:17 PM

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 26, 2010, 09:23:53 PM

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 26, 2010, 06:06:49 PM
Not really... ;)

Yes really... ;)

On realistic, your aiming reticle snaps to the enemy's head if you are aiming at their body when you push the zoom button.  That should be for rookies, but it's on realistic.

That doesn't make rookie mode 'play the same as realistic'.

No, I'm saying it makes it fucking easy, and it might as well be rookie mode.  On "realistic" mode, they shouldn't be doing the headshots for you.  DUH.

Quote from: Wh1tE_Dw4rF on April 27, 2010, 08:25:18 PM
You're Sam Fisher, you are not suppose to miss your shots.

You must be sarcastic here.  What the fuck ever happened to playing the game?  If you don't aim for the head then you shouldn't get a headshot.  Now, they hold your hand in order to make you feel cool, EVEN ON THE HARDEST DIFFICULTY.  If I line up for a nipple shot then give me a nipple shot.  Nothing takes me out of the experience more, nothing makes me feel LESS like Sam Fisher, than to see my cursor automatically go to the enemy's head.  It's insulting.  It doesn't make me feel like Sam to see the computer auto-headshot what should be a gut shot.   It does not belong in the hardest difficulty let alone the splinter cell franchise.

Haha okay maybe this thread is more entertaining than I thought it'd be. Auto headshots, oh man.

what about auto-ballshots for ps?

BOOM! Ballshot!

Well, that's fine, as long as I'm aiming at the spy's head.

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 27, 2010, 09:21:02 PM

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 27, 2010, 06:38:17 PM

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 26, 2010, 09:23:53 PM

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 26, 2010, 06:06:49 PM
Not really... ;)

Yes really... ;)

On realistic, your aiming reticle snaps to the enemy's head if you are aiming at their body when you push the zoom button.  That should be for rookies, but it's on realistic.

That doesn't make rookie mode 'play the same as realistic'.

No, I'm saying it makes it fucking easy, and it might as well be rookie mode.  On "realistic" mode, they shouldn't be doing the headshots for you.  DUH.

Quote from: Wh1tE_Dw4rF on April 27, 2010, 08:25:18 PM
You're Sam Fisher, you are not suppose to miss your shots.

You must be sarcastic here.  What the fuck ever happened to playing the game?  If you don't aim for the head then you shouldn't get a headshot.  Now, they hold your hand in order to make you feel cool, EVEN ON THE HARDEST DIFFICULTY.  If I line up for a nipple shot then give me a nipple shot.  Nothing takes me out of the experience more, nothing makes me feel LESS like Sam Fisher, than to see my cursor automatically go to the enemy's head.  It's insulting.  It doesn't make me feel like Sam to see the computer auto-headshot what should be a gut shot.   It does not belong in the hardest difficulty let alone the splinter cell franchise.

If you want a nipple shot you should play leasure suit larry or get the PC version.

Though I wonder, does it even matter where you shoot them? Like if you shoot them in their feet they will dance on one leg? (Like seen in GTA4)

Quote from: Wh1tE_Dw4rF on April 27, 2010, 10:46:37 PM
Though I wonder, does it even matter where you shoot them? Like if you shoot them in their feet they will dance on one leg? (Like seen in GTA4)

No it doesn't matter. You always get headshots.
Even when you don't want them.
And your name is Chuck.

Quote from: Wh1tE_Dw4rF on April 27, 2010, 10:46:37 PM

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 27, 2010, 09:21:02 PM

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 27, 2010, 06:38:17 PM

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 26, 2010, 09:23:53 PM

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 26, 2010, 06:06:49 PM
Not really... ;)

Yes really... ;)

On realistic, your aiming reticle snaps to the enemy's head if you are aiming at their body when you push the zoom button.  That should be for rookies, but it's on realistic.

That doesn't make rookie mode 'play the same as realistic'.

No, I'm saying it makes it fucking easy, and it might as well be rookie mode.  On "realistic" mode, they shouldn't be doing the headshots for you.  DUH.

Quote from: Wh1tE_Dw4rF on April 27, 2010, 08:25:18 PM
You're Sam Fisher, you are not suppose to miss your shots.

You must be sarcastic here.  What the fuck ever happened to playing the game?  If you don't aim for the head then you shouldn't get a headshot.  Now, they hold your hand in order to make you feel cool, EVEN ON THE HARDEST DIFFICULTY.  If I line up for a nipple shot then give me a nipple shot.  Nothing takes me out of the experience more, nothing makes me feel LESS like Sam Fisher, than to see my cursor automatically go to the enemy's head.  It's insulting.  It doesn't make me feel like Sam to see the computer auto-headshot what should be a gut shot.   It does not belong in the hardest difficulty let alone the splinter cell franchise.

If you want a nipple shot you should play leasure suit larry or get the PC version.

Though I wonder, does it even matter where you shoot them? Like if you shoot them in their feet they will dance on one leg? (Like seen in GTA4)

Well, seeing as how a headshot is an instant kill and a body shot is not, I'd say it matters where you shoot them.

Duh.

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 27, 2010, 10:56:17 PM

Quote from: Wh1tE_Dw4rF on April 27, 2010, 10:46:37 PM

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 27, 2010, 09:21:02 PM

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 27, 2010, 06:38:17 PM

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 26, 2010, 09:23:53 PM

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 26, 2010, 06:06:49 PM
Not really... ;)

Yes really... ;)

On realistic, your aiming reticle snaps to the enemy's head if you are aiming at their body when you push the zoom button.  That should be for rookies, but it's on realistic.

That doesn't make rookie mode 'play the same as realistic'.

No, I'm saying it makes it fucking easy, and it might as well be rookie mode.  On "realistic" mode, they shouldn't be doing the headshots for you.  DUH.

Quote from: Wh1tE_Dw4rF on April 27, 2010, 08:25:18 PM
You're Sam Fisher, you are not suppose to miss your shots.

You must be sarcastic here.  What the fuck ever happened to playing the game?  If you don't aim for the head then you shouldn't get a headshot.  Now, they hold your hand in order to make you feel cool, EVEN ON THE HARDEST DIFFICULTY.  If I line up for a nipple shot then give me a nipple shot.  Nothing takes me out of the experience more, nothing makes me feel LESS like Sam Fisher, than to see my cursor automatically go to the enemy's head.  It's insulting.  It doesn't make me feel like Sam to see the computer auto-headshot what should be a gut shot.   It does not belong in the hardest difficulty let alone the splinter cell franchise.

If you want a nipple shot you should play leasure suit larry or get the PC version.

Though I wonder, does it even matter where you shoot them? Like if you shoot them in their feet they will dance on one leg? (Like seen in GTA4)

Well, seeing as how a headshot is an instant kill and a body shot is not, I'd say it matters where you shoot them.

Duh.

Besides laws of nature, will npc's react differently on where they are shot?

Yes, they live or die depending on where they are shot.  I'd say that's a pretty important reaction, Dwarf.

I'm saying that instead of shooting someone where they will not die instantly, the game rewards you for no reason and kills them instantly.  Why? 

This game holds your hand more than any game I've seen in a long, long time.

So let's say I pretend that the Sam Fisher I play is really, REALLY pissed off, I could torture people by shooting in their toes one by one and they will become cripple, then move on to their hands - limbs -head to finish them off? Awesome.

Neither you nor myself have any clue what you are talking about.

Quote from: Wh1tE_Dw4rF on April 28, 2010, 12:32:38 AM
So let's say I pretend that the Sam Fisher I play is really, REALLY pissed off, I could torture people by shooting in their toes one by one and they will become cripple, then move on to their hands - limbs -head to finish them off? Awesome.

What I get from this is:

"The game is 'Helping' you do the thing you are already going to do. Making the game even faster by not having to manually aim 100% outright. Dumbed down? Perhaps, but then again... You were going to do it already. It's like if I got pissed because someone helped me clean dishes after a big dinner. They would have gotten done anyway since I was already doing it, but I COULD complain because that means I don't get 100% of the credit for doing them.

Also...

Realistically you do die from a head shot. Though realistically you yourself would probably be dead from any shot to your body considering games don't account for Blood loss, major organs, internal bleeding, shock, or anything of the sort. Making a black and white situation out of 'You die if I shoot you here, but if I shoot you HERE *points at leg* you will live' just puts in some sort of torture mechanic into play.

If you wanted a game that gave some sort of hit detection based on certain spots on the body then you played the wrong game. Sam is meant to make quick work of the people he encounters... Not torture them with nipple shots and things of the same such."

...or something like that...

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 28, 2010, 01:48:14 AM
Neither you nor myself have any clue what you are talking about.

Not everyone will play Conviction on their console with auto-aim.

every pc player that buys it betrays his gaming platform.
stop the crappy console ports ffs

Quote from: Rambo on April 28, 2010, 12:49:31 PM
every pc player that buys it betrays his gaming platform.
stop the crappy console ports ffs

No, I do that by torrenting every new release.

way to go ^^

Quote from: Wh1tE_Dw4rF on April 28, 2010, 12:47:48 PM

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 28, 2010, 01:48:14 AM
Neither you nor myself have any clue what you are talking about.

Not everyone will play Conviction on their console with auto-aim.

It's not even strictly auto aim, it just does what any console game would; if you aim close to a guards head, the aim will align automatically for you. But it doesn't just aim straight to the head, and if the guard were to move for example the aim doesn't stay on his head, it's not a lock on. Seemingly FarleyFan, you feel the need to hate this game for very minor reasons.

Quote from: Rambo on April 28, 2010, 12:49:31 PM
every pc player that buys it betrays his gaming platform.
stop the crappy console ports ffs

And anybody who shuns this game without even getting their facts straight is pretty fucking dumb. How do you betray a gaming platform by buying a game, let alone a good one?

There are tons of things that make this game way easier than it should be, and this mandatory lock on (that you probably don't even realize is happening) is just one way.  That's what I'm really complaining about dude.

I dont even know how u guys are even arguing....conviction is a fuc*king joke...its not splinter cell anymore. UBISOFT completely stripped away every classic element splinter cell introduced, and replaced them all with generic kiddy action sequences that suck. Mark and Execute is the most dumbest thing ever, and does all the work for you...im sorry but if i want to watch somebody shoot 5 guys in a row without breaking a sweat, ill just watch the show 24 or the movie diehard. ubisoft is complete thrash now

conviction blows, i played the demo on realistic , and boy it was anything but realistic. If thats what ubisoft thinks realistic gameplay is then they are complete retards, i ran through the first level in 5 minutes. the game is thrash and if u bought it then ur a dumbass

Alright, so I just played the first few maps on normal to get the hang of the controls. Hell I personally find it quite challenging to be honest! Died the first few times because I got spotted and all the lights turned on.

But now I sort of got the basic hang of it I'm looking forward to the upcoming levels. It's quite nice to play a predator.

Never liked any 3rd person shooter because apparantly I can't seem shoot anything due the camera positioning which sort of disorientates me in a wierd way so it forces me personally to use stealth as a tool which Conviction supplements perfectly. So far I haven't had regrets for actually paying Ubisoft's bonus. OMG for real!

I think it can be a good game, just not a good SC-game. Depends mostly on the bad premise and the direction of the story and the dumbed down gameplay mechanics.

Yeah it's an enjoyable game, but the old games make it look like trash (gameplay and graphics wise)

Quotemost dumbest

Little Baby Pig, I agree with your assessment again, but please, for the love of God, stop saying "most dumbest".  I've already warned you about the danger it presents.

Quote from: Cronky on April 28, 2010, 11:29:32 AM
"The game is 'Helping' you do the thing you are already going to do. Making the game even faster by not having to manually aim 100% outright. Dumbed down? Perhaps, but then again... You were going to do it already. It's like if I got pissed because someone helped me clean dishes after a big dinner. They would have gotten done anyway since I was already doing it, but I COULD complain because that means I don't get 100% of the credit for doing them.

i always wondered how console players justified needing auto aim to themselves

man this forum is so educational

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 28, 2010, 04:30:00 PM

Quote from: Rambo on April 28, 2010, 12:49:31 PM
every pc player that buys it betrays his gaming platform.
stop the crappy console ports ffs

And anybody who shuns this game without even getting their facts straight is pretty fucking dumb. How do you betray a gaming platform by buying a game, let alone a good one?

which facts?
your decisions as a consumer matter. sale numbers is all that big pulishers like ubisoft give a crap about nowadays.

Quote from: Ambiguous Rocket on April 28, 2010, 10:58:14 PM

Quote from: Cronky on April 28, 2010, 11:29:32 AM
"The game is 'Helping' you do the thing you are already going to do. Making the game even faster by not having to manually aim 100% outright. Dumbed down? Perhaps, but then again... You were going to do it already. It's like if I got pissed because someone helped me clean dishes after a big dinner. They would have gotten done anyway since I was already doing it, but I COULD complain because that means I don't get 100% of the credit for doing them.

i always wondered how console players justified needing auto aim to themselves

man this forum is so educational

Haha. I thought that too!

i was gonna win this match anyway, so who minds auto-win?  ::)

Stone, I'm going to win this debate anyway, so why doesn't my mouse/keyboard just take over?

That would be so great and stuff.

Quote from: little baby pigMark and Execute is the most dumbest thing ever,

Is it now?

Quote from: Ambiguous Rocket on April 28, 2010, 10:58:14 PMi always wondered how console players justified needing auto aim to themselves

man this forum is so educational

Cronky's defending a dumb idea because it's "new?" You don't say!

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 29, 2010, 01:06:15 AM
Stone, I'm going to win this debate anyway, so why doesn't my mouse/keyboard just take over?

That would be so great and stuff.

Your stating the same things over and over again in the hope that your argument succeeds, whereas I'm actually pointing out why I believe your wrong, and thus far you haven't offered a counter argument to anything I've said.

Quote from: Rambo on April 28, 2010, 11:59:20 PM

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 28, 2010, 04:30:00 PM

Quote from: Rambo on April 28, 2010, 12:49:31 PM
every pc player that buys it betrays his gaming platform.
stop the crappy console ports ffs

And anybody who shuns this game without even getting their facts straight is pretty fucking dumb. How do you betray a gaming platform by buying a game, let alone a good one?

which facts?
your decisions as a consumer matter. sale numbers is all that big pulishers like ubisoft give a crap about nowadays.

The facts about the game. Also, you don't know what publishers such as Ubisoft want; for a start, sales numbers only equates to the revenue that Ubisoft makes, that does not take into account the costs of running the business. Secondly, of course profit is the priority, this is the same for business selling a product/service, but Ubisoft still make quality games to this day, despite the target audience being casual gamers.

A 7 yr old boy could beat conviction on realistic mode...the game is no challenge and is a disgrace...casual gaming is destroying video games

QuoteIt's not even strictly auto aim, it just does what any console game would; if you aim close to a guards head, the aim will align automatically for you. But it doesn't just aim straight to the head, and if the guard were to move for example the aim doesn't stay on his head, it's not a lock on. Seemingly FarleyFan, you feel the need to hate this game for very minor reasons.

Oh bull fucking shit Stone.  Name another game where there is auto aim STRICLY TOWARDS THE HEAD.  If you can name one, check to see if it's optional.  If it is, then you lose.  If it isn't, then the game is probably easy as shit.

I've stated all my reasons for this game being dissapointing in several threads, and you pass them off as "minor reasons".  A little ignorant on your part.

QuoteThe facts about the game. Also, you don't know what publishers such as Ubisoft want; for a start, sales numbers only equates to the revenue that Ubisoft makes, that does not take into account the costs of running the business. Secondly, of course profit is the priority, this is the same for business selling a product/service, but Ubisoft still make quality games to this day, despite the target audience being casual gamers.

And why should I have to explain my opinion when you are doing it perfectly fine all by yourself.  They are making quality games - for CASUAL GAMERS.

In lay mans' terms, that means they are freaking easy.  My point, you proved.  Bravo.

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on April 30, 2010, 05:30:45 PM
A 7 yr old boy could beat conviction on realistic mode...the game is no challenge and is a disgrace...casual gaming is destroying video games

Dude, you either have never touched the game or you are just clueless. I find normal difficulty already quite a challenge and when I screw up I will be dead in a matter of seconds if I keep running about.

Quote from: Wh1tE_Dw4rF on April 30, 2010, 08:45:05 PM

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on April 30, 2010, 05:30:45 PM
A 7 yr old boy could beat conviction on realistic mode...the game is no challenge and is a disgrace...casual gaming is destroying video games

Dude, you either have never touched the game or you are just clueless. I find normal difficulty already quite a challenge and when I screw up I will be dead in a matter of seconds if I keep running about.

You say that he's clueless, and then say that you are clueless right after. 

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on April 30, 2010, 05:30:45 PM
A 7 yr old boy could beat conviction on realistic mode...the game is no challenge and is a disgrace...casual gaming is destroying video games

A seven year old could beat any game just as easily as somebody who is older than themselves; age doesn't equate to gaming skill.

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 30, 2010, 10:40:40 PM

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on April 30, 2010, 05:30:45 PM
A 7 yr old boy could beat conviction on realistic mode...the game is no challenge and is a disgrace...casual gaming is destroying video games

A seven year old could beat any game just as easily as somebody who is older than themselves; age doesn't equate to gaming skill.

It equates to brain power. And reflexes. And experience.

Quote from: FarleyFan on April 26, 2010, 09:23:53 PM

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on April 26, 2010, 06:06:49 PM
Not really... ;)

Yes really... ;)

On realistic, your aiming reticle snaps to the enemy's head if you are aiming at their body when you push the zoom button.  That should be for rookies, but it's on realistic.

This actually really pissed me off after I found out about it. I wish there was some way to turn it off >_>.

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on April 30, 2010, 05:30:45 PM
A 7 yr old boy could beat conviction on realistic mode...the game is no challenge and is a disgrace...casual gaming is destroying video games

I find it depressing that you're using age as an argument.

I see where you are coming from Farley... Auto-headshots? Splinter-cell has fallen a far way..

Things could be worse though.. this current incarnation could just be Assassins Creed with a Sam as a scruffy looking, bearded hobo who does kung fu - The original plan by Ubi!

It's just the inability to turn this assist off and the fact that it goes right for HEADSHOTS that makes this "feature" lame.

Even on the "hardest" difficulty, you are forced to use an assist that the game developers think that you need.  Isn't that just a slap in the face to players?  Some players just take it.

SC:C was a fun campaign experience the same can not be said for the online, i use to play SC:CT everyday and when DA came out i was'nt as dissapointed as most, i don't know why but i liked DA multi player not as much as CT but it was satisfying. I think they implimeted alot of new unnecessary features into Conviction making it to easy like auto-headshots(did't really use my gun much anyways  ;D) and Mark and execute, but one feature i thought really helped the game play was Last known position it really helped u plan ways to take out enemies in a certain area. Conviction was a good Stealth Action game but was't SPLINTER CELL. Although it was a short entertaining game it didn't live up to any of it's previous games. Not making a SvM killed the game along with a short campaign but hunter mode and versus mode are actually pretty fun to play with a friend. Turn off secondary weapons and don't use pistols and just snap each others necks is pretty fun i hope guys consider in PROJECT STEALTH a spy v spy type mode but i would rather play SvM anyways it just seems like a fun feature. I am looking forward to PROJECT STEALTH way more than conviction. Keep up the good work guys.

FOR ALL OF YOU MOTHA FUCKERS THAT LIKE CONVICTION...GET THE HELL OUTA THIS FORUM...THIS THREAD IS FOR CHAOS THEORY VETERANS THAT THINK UBISOFT IS A DISGRACE NOW AND FOR PEOPLE THAT HATE CONVICTION...CONVICTION IS A FUCKNIG CASUAL PEICE OF MOTHER CORN BARF FUCKING SHIT. FUCK YOU IF U LIK  CONVICTION U POTATO SHITS

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on May 04, 2010, 04:25:44 AM
FOR ALL OF YOU MOTHA FUCKERS THAT LIKE CONVICTION...GET THE HELL OUTA THIS FORUM...THIS THREAD IS FOR CHAOS THEORY VETERANS THAT THINK UBISOFT IS A DISGRACE NOW AND FOR PEOPLE THAT HATE CONVICTION...CONVICTION IS A FUCKNIG CASUAL PEICE OF MOTHER CORN BARF FUCKING SHIT. FUCK YOU IF U LIK  CONVICTION U POTATO SHITS

Ooh, someone's angry, isn't he?

Anyway, even looking past the auto headshots(which actually don't help that much, in retrospect), I found the campaign pretty enjoyable, although the co-op campaign was a bit lackluster and easy, even on realistic.

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on May 04, 2010, 04:25:44 AM
FOR ALL OF YOU MOTHA FUCKERS THAT LIKE CONVICTION...GET THE HELL OUTA THIS FORUM...THIS THREAD IS FOR CHAOS THEORY VETERANS THAT THINK UBISOFT IS A DISGRACE NOW AND FOR PEOPLE THAT HATE CONVICTION...CONVICTION IS A FUCKNIG CASUAL PEICE OF MOTHER CORN BARF FUCKING SHIT. FUCK YOU IF U LIK  CONVICTION U POTATO SHITS

can you stop posting forever please

Quote from: Ambiguous Rocket on May 04, 2010, 05:21:59 AM

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on May 04, 2010, 04:25:44 AM
FOR ALL OF YOU MOTHA FUCKERS THAT LIKE CONVICTION...GET THE HELL OUTA THIS FORUM...THIS THREAD IS FOR CHAOS THEORY VETERANS THAT THINK UBISOFT IS A DISGRACE NOW AND FOR PEOPLE THAT HATE CONVICTION...CONVICTION IS A FUCKNIG CASUAL PEICE OF MOTHER CORN BARF FUCKING SHIT. FUCK YOU IF U LIK  CONVICTION U POTATO SHITS

can you stop posting forever please

This was the most dumbest post ever.

@Ninja, how do you know "in retrospect" how much the auto-headshots helped?  The assist is only something you can judge while playing, and even then you might just think you are that good that you can pull off headshots so easy.  I wonder how much of the game was played for me, by the game.

And what is this that I've heard about no voice chat on coop for the PC version?  What the fucking fuck?  lmao

Quote from: FarleyFan on May 04, 2010, 07:01:17 AM
@Ninja, how do you know "in retrospect" how much the auto-headshots helped?  The assist is only something you can judge while playing, and even then you might just think you are that good that you can pull off headshots so easy.  I wonder how much of the game was played for me, by the game.

And what is this that I've heard about no voice chat on coop for the PC version?  What the fucking fuck?  lmao

Farley, while that above post was dumb you're constant disappointment for Convictions is also a little past it's welcome (This actually is meant for everyone doing it, but it's easier to target one person :)). Fanboy-ism aside you keep acting like a damn child when it comes to this game. Going on and on about minor features that while add a new flare to the game, also apparently demeans it.

It's like your father went to the store and bought you Store-Brand Cereal instead of Big Name Brand. You keep going on about HOW and WHY they are different. In the end though you're going to have to eat the whole bag and hope that the NEXT time he goes and buys cereal he'll get you the one you actually wanted.

What that equates to in video game terms is... Stop bitching because the game is different. You only go on about small things anyway. Ubisoft took THEIR series in a new direction. They can do whatever they want with it regardless of "Fan Appeal" because it's THEIR creation. Much in the same sense that the Devs here can add whatever they want to Project Stealth. Nautical Compass? It's in. Do you need to like it? No, cause you'll play with it there anyway and it doesn't look bad.

...That's all I really got right now. Just felt I hadn't left a comment in a while ;D

Quote from: Ambiguous Rocket on May 04, 2010, 05:21:59 AM
can you stop posting forever please

okay pig i changed my mind you are allowed to post as much as you want

BUT

all your posts have to be directed at cronky


cronky, same applies to you, either talk to pig or shut up forever




i think everyone will agree that if you two follow my instructions the forum will be a much better place

Quote from: Ambiguous Rocket on May 04, 2010, 08:55:10 AM

Quote from: Ambiguous Rocket on May 04, 2010, 05:21:59 AM
can you stop posting forever please

okay pig i changed my mind you are allowed to post as much as you want

BUT

all your posts have to be directed at cronky


cronky, same applies to you, either talk to pig or shut up forever




i think everyone will agree that if you two follow my instructions the forum will be a much better place

I don't know... With a bunch of close minded dicks like yourself posting this place gets a little stale.

:)

Though admittedly Pig can calm down. He's got some vendetta against Ubisoft like they ran his dog over then made him pay for their car to get detailed.

No, no, no, you're still talking to me. Talk to pig, not me. Seriously.

Quote from: Ambiguous Rocket on May 04, 2010, 09:20:32 AM
No, no, no, you're still talking to me. Talk to pig, not me. Seriously.

I think it's in the Forums best interest that you go jump back on the dick you rode in on! That way... just maybe this whole "Scene" could perhaps go on with a thread without your unnecessary back and forth you love to create!

Har Har Har. Look, I'm You!

Contributing nothing while simultaneously not giving two shits about what you have to say! I sure feel cool.

Here's an anime picture to lighten the mood!

(https://community.projectstealthgame.com/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fresources.toolwi.com%2Fresource%2Fpreview%3A2%2F88de53219fe9c19262586e06d4402741.gif&hash=ce4a7afef6f2ee791bef4e6d1e8be8fcdaa1d08e)

Lighten up all. For being annoying, you can go to the Off-Topic forum.

Else I'll have to clean up this thread :'(

I'm not exactly sure why this topic is in Public Discussion at all.

Pretty sure the description reads:

"Public Discussion:

Feel free to talk about Project Stealth in our public board."

Which might I add... is a little redundant.

Edit:

While I'm at it... Why was the Media Release put in the Presentation Section and not here? I know you were "Presenting" it to the public, but it seems more official than the description of THAT area is supposed to contain.

All the tick tocks have been there. I guess the subline of that section needs to change.

I think you should put all the Tick Tock's/Media Release in the "Information" section.

Centralize the location of progress instead of having it mucked up and hidden behind pages of unrelated Threads.

Just an idea.

It already has a Sticky with the links to most/all releases.

the front page (projectstealthgame.com) could use some new show-off stuff, too.

Quote from: frvge on May 04, 2010, 03:04:14 PM
It already has a Sticky with the links to most/all releases.

Learn something new everyday.

Guess I never actually read what was in there. Don't know why. Just seems so easy to glance over everything.

Last suggestion I can think of is make a "Dark" Theme for this forum. Coming from the ProjectStealth site and ending up here is a dramatic shift in color. To me, and I know it's minor, but this forum comes off as kind of an afterthought even though it is arguably the most used thing of your site. Getting a forum theme that matches the color scheme of the website seems... right.

I know that the border matches, but the part that actually matters doesn't have an alternative that we can pick from. (This time I checked before I posted this one... I think)

Will be done later. ETA 5 months.

if i remember correctly, the ubi forum color scheme was quite good.

A lot of people that I've recently talked to about Project Stealth only check the main website.  Like Rambo said you should probably post some of the stuff directly on the main site.  The recent screens would be a good idea.  People think this mod is just doomed to fail since the main site is hardly ever updated with new stuff.

Quote from: FarleyFan on May 04, 2010, 07:01:17 AM

Quote from: Ambiguous Rocket on May 04, 2010, 05:21:59 AM

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on May 04, 2010, 04:25:44 AM
FOR ALL OF YOU MOTHA FUCKERS THAT LIKE CONVICTION...GET THE HELL OUTA THIS FORUM...THIS THREAD IS FOR CHAOS THEORY VETERANS THAT THINK UBISOFT IS A DISGRACE NOW AND FOR PEOPLE THAT HATE CONVICTION...CONVICTION IS A FUCKNIG CASUAL PEICE OF MOTHER CORN BARF FUCKING SHIT. FUCK YOU IF U LIK  CONVICTION U POTATO SHITS

can you stop posting forever please

This was the most dumbest post ever.

@Ninja, how do you know "in retrospect" how much the auto-headshots helped?  The assist is only something you can judge while playing, and even then you might just think you are that good that you can pull off headshots so easy.  I wonder how much of the game was played for me, by the game.

And what is this that I've heard about no voice chat on coop for the PC version?  What the fucking fuck?  lmao

Simple. I've noticed some pretty amazing one hit kills going on by me, seemingly by luck, that happen a lot. Once I noticed that auto assist, though, I determined that they were the reason for my 'luck'.

Quote from: FarleyFan on May 05, 2010, 03:11:27 AM
A lot of people that I've recently talked to about Project Stealth only check the main website.  Like Rambo said you should probably post some of the stuff directly on the main site.  The recent screens would be a good idea.  People think this mod is just doomed to fail since the main site is hardly ever updated with new stuff.

The site has been updated a few days ago. Read the stuff in the 'Latest Downloads and Media'. I also added the HUD images to the Screenshots section of the Media page. And I added a FAQ.

folks wanna see new images/videos, not some tiny text line.
what you really should do (i told you that several times ages ago) is randomly/daily/... change the video. checking on the main page and seeing the kismet vid every time is frustrating and boring.
overall, you're page design is very professional as it focuses on the content. but this also means it sucks ass without the proper content...

Agreed, but we lack good videos. :(

Put up the rickroll.

Quote from: VenomousNinja on May 05, 2010, 03:41:10 AM

Quote from: FarleyFan on May 04, 2010, 07:01:17 AM

Quote from: Ambiguous Rocket on May 04, 2010, 05:21:59 AM

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on May 04, 2010, 04:25:44 AM
FOR ALL OF YOU MOTHA FUCKERS THAT LIKE CONVICTION...GET THE HELL OUTA THIS FORUM...THIS THREAD IS FOR CHAOS THEORY VETERANS THAT THINK UBISOFT IS A DISGRACE NOW AND FOR PEOPLE THAT HATE CONVICTION...CONVICTION IS A FUCKNIG CASUAL PEICE OF MOTHER CORN BARF FUCKING SHIT. FUCK YOU IF U LIK  CONVICTION U POTATO SHITS

can you stop posting forever please

This was the most dumbest post ever.

@Ninja, how do you know "in retrospect" how much the auto-headshots helped?  The assist is only something you can judge while playing, and even then you might just think you are that good that you can pull off headshots so easy.  I wonder how much of the game was played for me, by the game.

And what is this that I've heard about no voice chat on coop for the PC version?  What the fucking fuck?  lmao

Simple. I've noticed some pretty amazing one hit kills going on by me, seemingly by luck, that happen a lot. Once I noticed that auto assist, though, I determined that they were the reason for my 'luck'.

But you said in retrospect that the assist wasn't a big help.  I'm confused.

Quote from: frvge on May 05, 2010, 03:06:03 PM
Agreed, but we lack good videos. :(

You could just make it random as to which video appears on the home page.  That way, it doesn't look the same all the time.  Of course when you get a new and important one you could have that be the focus for a few weeks and then switch back to random.

Quote from: FarleyFan on May 05, 2010, 09:41:26 PM

Quote from: VenomousNinja on May 05, 2010, 03:41:10 AM

Quote from: FarleyFan on May 04, 2010, 07:01:17 AM

Quote from: Ambiguous Rocket on May 04, 2010, 05:21:59 AM

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on May 04, 2010, 04:25:44 AM
FOR ALL OF YOU MOTHA FUCKERS THAT LIKE CONVICTION...GET THE HELL OUTA THIS FORUM...THIS THREAD IS FOR CHAOS THEORY VETERANS THAT THINK UBISOFT IS A DISGRACE NOW AND FOR PEOPLE THAT HATE CONVICTION...CONVICTION IS A FUCKNIG CASUAL PEICE OF MOTHER CORN BARF FUCKING SHIT. FUCK YOU IF U LIK  CONVICTION U POTATO SHITS

can you stop posting forever please

This was the most dumbest post ever.

@Ninja, how do you know "in retrospect" how much the auto-headshots helped?  The assist is only something you can judge while playing, and even then you might just think you are that good that you can pull off headshots so easy.  I wonder how much of the game was played for me, by the game.

And what is this that I've heard about no voice chat on coop for the PC version?  What the fucking fuck?  lmao

Simple. I've noticed some pretty amazing one hit kills going on by me, seemingly by luck, that happen a lot. Once I noticed that auto assist, though, I determined that they were the reason for my 'luck'.

But you said in retrospect that the assist wasn't a big help.  I'm confused.

Then I misspoke the first time.

Quote from: VenomousNinja on May 04, 2010, 04:55:51 AM

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on May 04, 2010, 04:25:44 AM
FOR ALL OF YOU MOTHA FUCKERS THAT LIKE CONVICTION...GET THE HELL OUTA THIS FORUM...THIS THREAD IS FOR CHAOS THEORY VETERANS THAT THINK UBISOFT IS A DISGRACE NOW AND FOR PEOPLE THAT HATE CONVICTION...CONVICTION IS A FUCKNIG CASUAL PEICE OF MOTHER CORN BARF FUCKING SHIT. FUCK YOU IF U LIK  CONVICTION U POTATO SHITS

Ooh, someone's angry, isn't he?

Anyway, even looking past the auto headshots(which actually don't help that much, in retrospect), I found the campaign pretty enjoyable, although the co-op campaign was a bit lackluster and easy, even on realistic.

Lol Ninja you 180'd on me.   :P

Is there seriously no voice communication on COOP?  Isn't that just complete and total proof that Ubi is about as lazy as it gets nowadays?  It makes it hard for me to enjoy their games when they pull this crap.  Knowing that the devs didn't care about their product makes me care less about it.  You know what I mean?

I know there's voice COOP in the 360 version, I've tested this. Dunno about PC.

Ya apparently they didn't implement voice communication into a cooperational game mode for PC.  Don't know how that makes sense.  But whatever.

i just finished the sp portion of the game in about 8 hours (fooling around a lot), i'm really happy i didn't spend any money on this. i have to admit it was pretty good, but seriously, come on ubisoft!
making games shorter and disregarding the mp part is something i'm not willing to support. especially not for 50+ bucks...

Quote from: frvge on May 05, 2010, 03:06:03 PM
Agreed, but we lack good videos. :(

don't bullshit me, just put it on ramdom. the lakehouse vid is way more impressive than the kismet stuff anyways...

Interesting idea!
Will hopefully be implemented during the weekend, after I re-render the files first.

Maybe do a vid doc on the devs.  Just to show that they are alive and not fishing on the moon or something.

Quote from: frvge on May 07, 2010, 02:56:22 PM
Interesting idea!
Will hopefully be implemented during the weekend, after I re-render the files first.

Am I asking too much to say...

I demand HD (or Near HD) Quality Videos!

Make it an option to watch it in HD, of course, for those with lesser internet connections. Or just make it possible to download them in HD, but you can only stream them in whatever you have now.

Now if by Re-Render you mean this exact thing, then Carry On.

Edit: On futher inspection I see SOME videos are a good size, and some show signs that they were going to have a higher Res version (Lakehouse). Make those available.

Edit2: Seems that all the ones that are .wmv are the crappy culprits! Plus those ones (and I'm not sure if I'm the only one) never gives a real time for downloading. Just keeps downloading saying, "Unknown Time Remaining" till it's done.

Quote from: FarleyFan on May 07, 2010, 09:32:55 PM
Maybe do a vid doc on the devs.  Just to show that they are alive and not fishing on the moon or something.

i demand a devs-fishing-on-the-moon music video!

Quote from: Cronky on May 07, 2010, 09:53:53 PM
Seems that all the ones that are .wmv are the crappy culprits!

WMV is fine for general purpose HD; it might be an idea to include an MKV encoded in h.264 too, for those who want the best quality you can get :)

Quote from: Rambo on May 07, 2010, 09:57:32 PM

Quote from: FarleyFan on May 07, 2010, 09:32:55 PM
Maybe do a vid doc on the devs.  Just to show that they are alive and not fishing on the moon or something.

i demand a devs-fishing-on-the-moon music video!

I guess I subconsciously had a great idea.  I need to be subconscious more often!

Quote from: STON3COLDKILLA on May 07, 2010, 10:30:31 PM

Quote from: Cronky on May 07, 2010, 09:53:53 PM
Seems that all the ones that are .wmv are the crappy culprits!

WMV is fine for general purpose HD; it might be an idea to include an MKV encoded in h.264 too, for those who want the best quality you can get :)

I wasn't trying to say that WMV was a bad format. Just that the videos on this site that are WMV's are worse quality than those that are AVI's.

I second the MKV.

Costs are mostly the reason why the filesizes are small.
And the fact that balancing filesize to quality takes some knowledge that I don't really possess.

Why don't you take some of the money out of your moon fishing fund?

Oops.

I just bought a new boat with it. :(

If you bought it with space cash then you should know that you got a great deal, because space cash is worth nothing.

Oh yes, I know it was a great deal. God, I wish you could see this boat. It. Is. Trippy.

Us devs are gonna enjoy this shit.

Tippy boats are bad.

Quote from: frvge on May 08, 2010, 01:08:13 AM
Costs are mostly the reason why the filesizes are small.
And the fact that balancing filesize to quality takes some knowledge that I don't really possess.

With your WMV's you just need to find a nice bitrate and encoding process really; I haven't downloaded the ones you have encoded, but a VBR of around 6500 should be okay :).

A sig-worthy post from the Ubi site.  I know a lot of posts on the Conviction forum are sig worthy but this one, I feel, just takes the cake.

QuoteIf you want to be stealthy try to kill everyone without getting detected, after
all Dead Men Tells No Tales

IF YOU BUY ANY OF UBISOFTS MODERN DAY THRASH, THAN YOU ARE A BRAINWASHED UBI ROBOT THAT IS A CASUAL GAMING, conviction is seriously horrible , whoever wasted 60 smackers on that crap casual game is a moron by every means possible.

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on May 11, 2010, 05:51:40 AM
IF YOU BUY ANY OF UBISOFTS MODERN DAY THRASH, THAN YOU ARE A BRAINWASHED UBI ROBOT THAT IS A CASUAL GAMING, conviction is seriously horrible , whoever wasted 60 smackers on that crap casual game is a moron by every means possible.

Do me a favor: Go fuck yourself

I second Ion, but only if by "fuck" he means kill.

Quote from: Ion.67 on May 11, 2010, 06:03:57 AM

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on May 11, 2010, 05:51:40 AM
IF YOU BUY ANY OF UBISOFTS MODERN DAY THRASH, THAN YOU ARE A BRAINWASHED UBI ROBOT THAT IS A CASUAL GAMING, conviction is seriously horrible , whoever wasted 60 smackers on that crap casual game is a moron by every means possible.

Do me a favor: Go fuck yourself

fuck you fucking casual forum moron, go jack off to the simpsons and listen to ur garth brooks

Ban him before I laugh even more at the ridiculously random posts.  They are actually kind of funny if you are in that mood, but anyone can do that.

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on May 11, 2010, 06:56:02 AM

Quote from: Ion.67 on May 11, 2010, 06:03:57 AM

Quote from: Little Baby PiG on May 11, 2010, 05:51:40 AM
IF YOU BUY ANY OF UBISOFTS MODERN DAY THRASH, THAN YOU ARE A BRAINWASHED UBI ROBOT THAT IS A CASUAL GAMING, conviction is seriously horrible , whoever wasted 60 smackers on that crap casual game is a moron by every means possible.

Do me a favor: Go fuck yourself

fuck you fucking casual forum moron, go jack off to the simpsons and listen to ur garth brooks

No problem. But still go die

Stop it. Pig was in a weird mood, and everything is fine again.

Yeah right...


:D


His gollum mades him do itsis...